-
All our servers are currently overloaded. Please try again later or get our premium subscription.Get PremiumRefresh pageWe are currently experiencing technical difficulties with our servers. We hope to have this resolved soon. This issue doesn't affect premium users.Get PremiumWatch on MixDrop/MyStream
Rings
TrailerA young woman sacrifices herself to save her boyfriend by watching a cursed videotape, only to realise that Samara Morgan, the preteen whose untimely death set this curse in motion years ago, has pecial plans for her.Actors: Matilda Anna Ingrid Lutz, Alex Roe, Johnny Galecki, Vincent DOnofrio, Aimee Teegarden, Bonnie Morgan, Chuck David Willis, Patrick R. Walker, Zach Roerig, Laura Wiggins, Lizzie Brocheré, ...»Director: F. Javier GutiérrezCountry: United StatesDuration: 102 minQuality: HDRelease: 2017IMDb: 4.50 CommentsSort By- Newest
- Oldest
-
Actors of "Rings"
-
Characters of "Rings"
JuliaPlayed by: Matilda Anna Ingrid LutzHoltPlayed by: Alex RoeGabrielPlayed by: Johnny GaleckiBurkePlayed by: Vincent D'OnofrioSkyePlayed by: Aimee TeegardenSadakoPlayed by: Bonnie MorganFaithPlayed by: Laura WigginsFirst OfficerPlayed by: Dave Blamy -
Directors of "Rings"
-
Creators of "Rings"
-
Critic Reviews of "Rings"
April WolfeFebruary 28, 2017Unlike Naomi Watts' character in the first two films, Julia and Holt are undistinguished by complexity.
Peter TraversFebruary 04, 2017If crap movies carried penalties for inflicting torture on audiences, then Rings would merit a death sentence.
Christian HolubFebruary 03, 2017Rings embodies a common problem of attempted franchise revivals: indecision about its intentions.
Thelma AdamsFebruary 03, 2017In the end Rings didn't make me want to drink Drano. It had enough distractions but that's a low bar for a horror movie that includes D'Onofrio and Galecki, who could run rings around the rest of the cast given better material.
A.A. DowdFebruary 03, 2017It's not a terrible setup. But Rings doesn't end up doing much with its fresh ideas.
Alex CaseyMarch 09, 2017Rings is cursed from the outset, doomed by the same technology in which the franchise once thrived.
Donald ClarkeMarch 03, 2017The cursed video now looks like an experimental film made by somebody who has watched more Marilyn Manson videos than Stan Brackhage pieces. It does, however, provide clues to a mystery that really isn't worth solving.
Dominic CorryFebruary 23, 2017A lot more enjoyable than the 2005 sequel, but never comes close to scaling the heights of Verbinski's film.
Leigh PaatschFebruary 22, 2017The bulk of Rings is content to repeat former gory glories (often not so coherently) for minimal impact.
April WolfeFebruary 28, 2017Unlike Naomi Watts' character in the first two films, Julia and Holt are undistinguished by complexity.
Peter TraversFebruary 04, 2017If crap movies carried penalties for inflicting torture on audiences, then Rings would merit a death sentence.
Christian HolubFebruary 03, 2017Rings embodies a common problem of attempted franchise revivals: indecision about its intentions.
Thelma AdamsFebruary 03, 2017In the end Rings didn't make me want to drink Drano. It had enough distractions but that's a low bar for a horror movie that includes D'Onofrio and Galecki, who could run rings around the rest of the cast given better material.
A.A. DowdFebruary 03, 2017It's not a terrible setup. But Rings doesn't end up doing much with its fresh ideas.
Alex CaseyMarch 09, 2017Rings is cursed from the outset, doomed by the same technology in which the franchise once thrived.
Donald ClarkeMarch 03, 2017The cursed video now looks like an experimental film made by somebody who has watched more Marilyn Manson videos than Stan Brackhage pieces. It does, however, provide clues to a mystery that really isn't worth solving.
Dominic CorryFebruary 23, 2017A lot more enjoyable than the 2005 sequel, but never comes close to scaling the heights of Verbinski's film.
Leigh PaatschFebruary 22, 2017The bulk of Rings is content to repeat former gory glories (often not so coherently) for minimal impact.
-
Gallery of "Rings"